|Wine Cultivation.com - Discover how to cultivate grapes and find tips on growing under different soil / weather conditions Visit Wine Cultivation.com|| Informational|
Medical ArticlesStage 3 Passing Through The Thoracic Esophagus
The thoracic esophagus will be seen to expand during inspira...
Treatment Of Pseudo-anginas
The treatment of these pseudo-angibas depends, of course, on ...
Ulcers Case Xxix
The peculiarity of the present case arose from neglect in eva...
Anomalies Of The Tracheobronchial Tree
Tracheobronchial anomalies are relatively rare. Congenital e...
Janeway [Footnote: Janeway, T. C.: A Clinical Study of Hypert...
Removal Of Growth From The Laryngeal Ventricle
After exposing the larynx in the usual manner, if the head i...
Violent Reaction Sthenic
If both, the contagious poison and the organism, are very str...
Resume Of After-care Of A Tracheotomic Case
1. Always bear in mind that tracheotomy is not an ultimate ...
Emetic; stimulate and keep warm; keep patient lying down. ...
This is a name applied to pain in the region of the heart cau...
An expectant mother should lead a quiet, orderly and healthful...
Its Cause and Prevention. The other great disease of the lung...
Fatigue, excessive heat, fright, loss of blood, hunger, etc., ...
Priessnitz's Method The Wet-sheet-pack
a remedy which, alone, is worth the whole antiphlogistic, dia...
Relaxed And Atrophied Conditions
I alluded, above, to a distinction between a relaxed and an ...
The Sixth Sense. Though we usually speak of having five sens...
Anatomy Of Larynx Trachea Bronchi And Esophagus Endoscopically Considered
The larynx is a cartilaginous box, triangular in cross-sectio...
Should be an indication that food in general or some certain k...
This is applied as follows. Over a large armchair spread a fol...
Instructions To The Patient
Before beginning endoscopy the patient should be told that h...
The Organic Versus Chemical Feud
Category: Diet and Nutrition
Source: How And When To Be Your Own Doctor
Now, regrettably, and at great personal risk to my reputation, I
must try to puncture the very favorite belief of food religionists,
the doctrine that organically grown food is as nutritious as food
can possibly be, Like Woody Allen's brown-rice-eating friends,
people think if you eat Organic foods, you will inevitably live a
very long time and be very healthy. Actually, the Organic vs.
chemical feud is in many ways false. Many (not all) samples of
organically grown food are as low or lower in nutrition as foods
raised with chemical fertilizers. Conversely, wisely using chemical
fertilizers (not pesticides) can greatly increase the nutritional
value of food. Judiciously used Organic fertilizing substances can
also do that as well or better. And in either case, using chemical
fertilizers or so-called organic fertilizers, to maximize nutrition
the humus content of the soil must be maintained. But, raising soil
organic matter levels too high can result in a massive reduction in
the nutritional content of the food being grown--a very frequent
mistake on the part of Organic devotees. In other words, growing
nutrition is a science, and is not a matter of religion.
The food I fed to my daughter in childhood, though Organic according
to Rodale and the certification bureaucrats, though providing this
organic food to my family and clients gave me a feeling of
self-righteousness, was not grown with an understanding of the
nutritional consequences of electing to use one particular Organic
fertilizing substance over another. So we and a lot of regional
Organic market gardeners near us that we bought from, were raising
food that was far from ideally nutritious. At least though, our food
was free of pesticide residues.
The real dichotomy in food is not "chemical" fertilizer versus
"Organic," It is between industrial food and quality food. What I
mean by industrial food is that which is raised with the intention
of maximizing profit or yield. There is no contradiction between
raising food that the "rabbis" running Organic certification
bureaucracies would deem perfectly "kosher" and raising that same
food to make the most possible money or the biggest harvest. When a
farmer grows for money, they want to produce the largest number of
bushels, crates, tons, bales per acre. Their criteria for success is
primarily unit volume. Many gardeners think the same way. To
maximize bulk yield they build soil fertility in a certain direction
(organically or chemically) and choose varieties that produce
greater bulk. However, nature is ironic in this respect. The most
nutritious food is always lower yielding. The very soil management
practices that maximize production simultaneously reduce nutrition.
The real problem we are having about our health is not that there
are residues of pesticides in our food. The real problem is that
there are only residues of nutrition left in our foods. Until our
culture comes to understand this and realizes that the health costs
of accepting less than optimum food far exceeds the profits made by
growing bulk, it will not be possible to frequently find the
ultimate of food quality in the marketplace, organically grown or
not. It will not be possible to find food that is labeled or
identified according to its real nutritional value. The best I can
say about Organic food these days is that it probably is no less
nutritious than chemically-grown food while at least it is free of
Next: The Poor Start
Previous: The Human Comedy