Wall Decor.ca - Download the EBook Interior DesignInformational Site Network Informational
Privacy


Home


Medical Articles


Mother's Remedies


Household Tips


Medicine History


Forgotten Remedies


Search

Medical Articles

About Frights

HERE are two true stories and a remarkable contrast. ...

Temperature Of The Sick-room

The _temperature of the sick-room_ should not be much above 6...

Dropsy

This trouble is rather a symptom than a disease. It rises from ...

Direct Laryngoscopy In Children

The epiglottis in children is usually strongly curled, often...

Prolapsus Uteri Falling Of The Womb

Take the B D current, of good medium force, and give general ...

Dysmenorrhoea - Painful Menstruation

For this disorder, I know of no one remedy so valuable as the...

General Principles Of Position

As will be seen in Fig. 47 the trachea and esophagus are not...

Difficulties Of Esophagoscopy

The beginner may find the esophagoscope seemingly rigidly fi...

Length Of The Fast

How long should a person fast? In cases where there are serio...

Dyspepsia

See Indigestion. ...

Acute Dilatation Of The Stomach

This condition is not well understood, nor is its frequence k...

The Surgical Dissection Of The Principal Bloodvessels And Nerves Of The Iliac And Femoral Regions

Through the groin, as through the axilla, the principal blood...

Tracheobronchial Diphtheria

Urgent dyspnea in diphtheria when no membrane and but slight...

Mouth-gag

Wide gagging prevents proper exposure of the larynx by forci...

Measuring Rule

It is customary to locate esophageal lesions by denoting the...

Epilepsy

The first sign of such an illness is a brief and slight attack...

Gassner

JOHANN JOSEPH GASSNER, who was regarded as a thaumaturge by h...

The Royal Touch

Malcolm. Well; more anon.--Comes the king forth, I pray ...

Treatment Of Other Eruptive Fevers

The treatment as prescribed for scarlatina in this pamphlet, ...

Toxic Disturbances And Heart Rate

Under this head it is not proposed to consider disturbances...



The Organic Versus Chemical Feud





Category: Diet and Nutrition
Source: How And When To Be Your Own Doctor

Now, regrettably, and at great personal risk to my reputation, I
must try to puncture the very favorite belief of food religionists,
the doctrine that organically grown food is as nutritious as food
can possibly be, Like Woody Allen's brown-rice-eating friends,
people think if you eat Organic foods, you will inevitably live a
very long time and be very healthy. Actually, the Organic vs.
chemical feud is in many ways false. Many (not all) samples of
organically grown food are as low or lower in nutrition as foods
raised with chemical fertilizers. Conversely, wisely using chemical
fertilizers (not pesticides) can greatly increase the nutritional
value of food. Judiciously used Organic fertilizing substances can
also do that as well or better. And in either case, using chemical
fertilizers or so-called organic fertilizers, to maximize nutrition
the humus content of the soil must be maintained. But, raising soil
organic matter levels too high can result in a massive reduction in
the nutritional content of the food being grown--a very frequent
mistake on the part of Organic devotees. In other words, growing
nutrition is a science, and is not a matter of religion.

The food I fed to my daughter in childhood, though Organic according
to Rodale and the certification bureaucrats, though providing this
organic food to my family and clients gave me a feeling of
self-righteousness, was not grown with an understanding of the
nutritional consequences of electing to use one particular Organic
fertilizing substance over another. So we and a lot of regional
Organic market gardeners near us that we bought from, were raising
food that was far from ideally nutritious. At least though, our food
was free of pesticide residues.

The real dichotomy in food is not "chemical" fertilizer versus
"Organic," It is between industrial food and quality food. What I
mean by industrial food is that which is raised with the intention
of maximizing profit or yield. There is no contradiction between
raising food that the "rabbis" running Organic certification
bureaucracies would deem perfectly "kosher" and raising that same
food to make the most possible money or the biggest harvest. When a
farmer grows for money, they want to produce the largest number of
bushels, crates, tons, bales per acre. Their criteria for success is
primarily unit volume. Many gardeners think the same way. To
maximize bulk yield they build soil fertility in a certain direction
(organically or chemically) and choose varieties that produce
greater bulk. However, nature is ironic in this respect. The most
nutritious food is always lower yielding. The very soil management
practices that maximize production simultaneously reduce nutrition.

The real problem we are having about our health is not that there
are residues of pesticides in our food. The real problem is that
there are only residues of nutrition left in our foods. Until our
culture comes to understand this and realizes that the health costs
of accepting less than optimum food far exceeds the profits made by
growing bulk, it will not be possible to frequently find the
ultimate of food quality in the marketplace, organically grown or
not. It will not be possible to find food that is labeled or
identified according to its real nutritional value. The best I can
say about Organic food these days is that it probably is no less
nutritious than chemically-grown food while at least it is free of
pesticide residues.





Next: The Poor Start

Previous: The Human Comedy



Add to del.icio.us Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to Del.icio.us Add to Google Add to Twitter Add to Stumble Upon
Add to Informational Site Network
Report
Privacy
SHAREADD TO EBOOK


Viewed 1165